The first question. Who poses the danger? page 2
This person (or persons) has to be able to create a danger issue
- by their presence in the victim’s vicinity,
- by the fact that they carry a concealed weapon (gun) and
- by upholding criminal intent i.e., being prepared to shoot if asked to do so,
- BUT at the same time they must not attract attention. They blend in with the crowd and if they are given access to the potential victim, as for instance a spare key to their house, then they can even be out of sight of the victim.
These criminals used are euphemistically called “gun-carrying individuals” or GCIs by the toxic subcultures of society. To get all of the above conditions the GCIs must be weakly related to the person targeted BUT there must also be a three way entanglement that is uncommon.
A word about relationships.
What I am going to say here about relationships and thoughts is the average person’s experience. However the average person’s experience is diametrically opposed to the opinions of most scientists. And note that I say opinions because they deny the evidence and cite their conjecture instead. I will discuss this matter with respect to science in more detail on a later page.
The question of thoughts, which in some cases are our awareness, and the mind as a non-physical aspect of reality, a platform on which we all participate, are hugely significant in foul game play. Without them there are no foul games that can be played.
Two strangers can’t interact through direct mental means (i.e., ESP) with the exception of extremely, highly aware individuals. These people are extremely.. but extremely rare! Most people are not aware to such a high degree. Not that they cannot be but because to some extent or other we all choose to live within a comfort zone. A comfort zone is not rest. Rather a comfort zone is really mental fuzz. I discuss this in my blog here if you want to read more. You can use your back arrow to return here.
It is through relationship that two or more people can interact mentally and a part of that interaction is that they become perceptive of one another’s ideas and thoughts under certain conditions. Most people do not realize that the thoughts they perceive are not their own thoughts because toxic people present them very cunningly, always utilizing what they have learned of another person’s way of thinking. Thoughts are perceived because relationship creates entanglement in the mind. The people who become related have, for evermore a connection in the mind. They may forget one another if they part but it is still possible to recollect the other and under special circumstances be able to convey thoughts to the other person in the old relationship. And again the other person will only see it as a memory and nothing more. The degree of perception is directly related to the strength or weakness of the relational entanglement. If the relationship is very strong, then the mental perception is also strong. A strong relationship arises when people become close or are close as a result of their circumstances, as for instance they are siblings in a family, even when they hate each other!
People who are intimate and whose relationship is also trusted and goes on for a considerable length of time also have a strong relationship. Trust is a very important element in a relationship. Trust and closeness are important elements that make for strong relationship and hence also strong ESP. How well you know the other person also counts. One way that toxic people avoid some detection is to say little about themselves and also say things in a way that deceives the other party. For instance my husband had told me that his mother sent him to a Seventh Day Adventist church when he was very young because there was no other church closer to their house. It gave the impression that he was a Christian and thus believed in God, when in actual fact he was an atheist and only admitted it after 24 years of marriage! He knew I would not have married him if I had known he was an atheist. I have atheists as friends but I did not want to marry one.
This cheat is mostly done by toxic people to shield their thoughts. It did not work too well in my late husband’s case because while he tried to shield himself I was able to see past the screen. I have strong mental perceptivity owing to many thousands of hours of meditational experience. However most people in a close, long term relationship will have a fair amount of perceptivity and will be able to be insightful enough to have some ideas as to any underhanded cheating. The problem is mainly that people don’t realize that many of their thoughts are perceptions and not of their own making.
People in a strong relationship can consciously detected the other party’s presented thoughts or expressed thinking, even when they are not in the same place. Indeed they may even be in two different countries! However it is not all thoughts that are detected. Only those thoughts that are relevant can be detected consciously. Thus you can appreciate that there are reasons why other “like-minded” people are used in the basic cheat by the chief offender. A toxic person in a relationship with another that they want to manipulate cannot afford to uphold ideas of danger for that person themselves because they will be detected or at the very least suspected and lose the trust of the other person. Once they have lost trust the relationship may be lost. Thus they, as the chief offender, i.e., the person who has the primary interest and who has also the primary gain out of the foul games, absolutely needs to employ others to do their dirty work for them while they appear clean and uninvolved. If they get suspected then the ideas that they want to stick won’t stick again.
Chief offenders can be anyone who has an interest and something to gain out of exploiting a relationship to gain power and influence over the other person. They want the ideas that they convey to stick because only then are they enabled to manipulate and control the other person. These people are all about exploitation and never relationship for the joy of relating. Such toxic people are commonly spouses, siblings, employers, other employees, neighbors, best friends and may even achieve the status of confidante. The all-important condition that a toxic person needs, to victimize another person, is relationship and that relationship needs to be seen to be clean.. a genuine relationship when indeed it is a toxic relationship. So the toxic person needs to be careful not to uphold ideas that will “give the game away”! Often they compensate for any ideas that they may hold from time to time by showing a caring face. Many also go out of their way to do things that may “prove” to the other person that they are an ally when really they are an enemy in the fullest sense of the word. My toxic husband had finally admitted that it was an anathema to be nice and cordial except when it was about trickery and cheating the other. In betraying the other person by one’s words and actions he said it was “as sweet as candy”.
At the other end of the relationship scale we have the extremely weak relational entanglement. This is a relationship in which the other party is barely known and in the case of foul game play is only seen in passing. That is they have just attracted the person’s attention for a very short time, most often only from a few seconds to a minute or two. However here again it is not anyone that we notice that can become related to us sufficiently to make us perceptive of them at some later time, even though subconsciously so. There needs to be a bit more. Indeed my late, toxic husband indicated that the chief offender needs to be party to the entanglement. Hence it is a weak relationship but it is linked to a strong relationship. This link is also important in the game play because the weakly related other parties, usually other toxic people or GCIs (gun carrying individuals) are, in the mind of the targeted person/ victim subconsciously connected back to the chief offender who made the “introduction” or “arranged for the meeting”.
At some later stage, when the targeted person becomes perceptive of their presence there is also an issue of danger so it is not only that they are connected to the chief offender. These people are armed the second time around. And they are serious criminals who have killed and would again. So when they come into the presence of the targeted person they are not seen but because there is an issue of danger, the person targeted will become aware of the danger though they will not be aware why they sense the danger. They will not guess that some of the people in their vicinity are the reason that they suddenly feel fear or feel hot. GCIs are considered a very valuable commodity by the toxic under-culture.
So how can criminals be weakly related to the targeted person?
I will explain this using the words of my toxic husband who told me about it. He said “first you introduce the target to the crims”. He used the slang word ‘crims’ when he was talking about criminals and commonly used even euphemistic words like “watchers”, supervisors and “workers” to describe these people.
“You have to take the target somewhere where they can see one or more of the crims” he said. “The evil one (which is how he described himself and other toxic people) “gets the target to go out somewhere with them. They may go for a coffee in a coffee shop or go shopping together. It has to be something ordinary because a normal approach is always used by evil ones.”
So the toxic (evil) person takes the person that they want to cheat to a public place where there are lots of other people around. In such circumstances the criminals are ‘just people in the crowd. However they need to be seen by the person to be cheated. And he explained it thus.
“A minor incident is created so that the target’s attention is drawn to the crims. The crims may be other evil people” he said “or they may just be common criminals who have done time for something, murder, armed robbery, rape, child molestation.” He then added “the incident is minor; minor” he stressed. “One just wants the target’s attention. One doesn’t want the target to remember them and recognize them later. The target must be able to be aware of the crims without realizing it” he told me.
I have heard other toxic people call these “an introduction” or “getting an introduction” and as “a meeting” or as “arranging a meeting”. This is a part of what they call “procedures”.
So to be able to carry out a basic cheat the person to be cheated has to have first met the criminals that are to be used and not known it, i.e., not have seen the relevance of the incident they witnessed. And they must not have seen the people long enough or paid them sufficient attention as to remember them later.
It is also important to understand that there is a public perception created by what are known as “acts of random violence”. That perception is that harm and even death can happen without warning in a public place. My toxic husband admitted that incidents that are commonly known as “random violence” are not random at all but only seen as random by most people because the offenders cannot be tied to the victims. The reason he explained was because so-called “go-betweens” are used. He explained that a network of toxic people is often very large and there are different levels. People on one level do not know many or any people on another level. To enable communication there are people at every level that know some people on the level above and some on the level below. These people can then be utilized for people on one level to communicate with people on another level either above or below. That way the people who communicate via the go-betweens need never meet nor know the other person in any way at all. They can honestly say “I don’t know that person”. Hence a job can be arranged, criminals used and a person can be murdered and the killers responsible cannot be tied to the victim.
Random acts of violence are commonly played down and that allows for them to happen again and again. It puts a belief into people mind in a subconscious manner. To make something subconscious the most common method is to attribute little value to it or dismiss it as unimportant. It is thus dismissed because it has not affected the people themselves. However a belief that random violence does happen is active at the subconscious level and that means it can be utilized without the person being consciously aware of it. This is an important belief in what my husband euphemistically called “creating problems for people” in a public place. By “problems” he admitted he was talking about anxiety and panic and other medical problems.
Before we go on with the basic cheat we need to understand and appreciate that there is also a scientific cheat that helps hide the basic cheat’s conditions. Thus the person cheated is blind sighted by medical misinformation.
Next.. page 3
Back to page 1.